We need more to justify it, but we're not so far away
Even for a company as scandalous as Facebook, it was a bad week for the social networkSeparate surveys have revealed that Facebook allowed more than companies to access the private messages of people, while making it impossible for users to avoid the ads location-aware. After months of fallout from the scandal of Cambridge Analytica, u.s. prosecutors have finally filed a lawsuit against Facebook for its practice of sharing data. Individually, none of this would be likely to bring down Facebook, but some experts believe that, collectively, this could mark the end of the monster of the Internet. David Carroll, an associate professor at Parsons School of Design in New York, said that this week, Facebook may have finally come to an end to his flight.
As a critic openly critical of the way Facebook uses personal data, professor Carroll is currently pursuing Cambridge Analytica pursuant to the law on data protection, following the role of british society in the extraction of data from million users of Facebook for political profiling at the us presidential elections in.
But the latest revelations that other technology companies have had access to the private messages of people is well beyond what he believed Facebook to be able to do. “While I am deeply skeptical of Facebook, I was surprised by the latest revelations”, he told The Independent. “I did not know that it could be so bad in terms of scope and scale. But all seems to correspond to the master plan of Zuckerberg for his world domination. ” The first lawsuit against Facebook regarding the scandal of the Cambridge Analytica, which has affected more than million users, is a courtesy of the attorney general of the district of Columbia. It is unlikely that this will be the last, given that Facebook is currently the subject of investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, and this, only in the United States. A fine relatively insignificant five-hundred, pounds sterling, which has been imposed on Facebook in the Uk could be overwhelming to the result of investigations conducted by the regulator, the irish data protection, which are regarded as the first serious test of the new regulations of the general european data protection. But with over two billion users in the world and an annual income of more than forty billion dollars in, it will take more than a fine in order to have a significant impact on Facebook. Professor Carroll asked that the CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and other executives to be cited to appear and think that it should not be long to come to fruition. “We have to take an oath and ask them questions that they cannot dodge. This will depend on the investigation of the special adviser to Mueller. It is conceivable that other facts come to our knowledge to justify the assignment of Zuckerberg and that we could find out what he knew and when. ” The various scandals have given rise to several campaigns of boycott of Facebook, the latest being an organization of defense of civil rights in the United States. The event, called LogOut, which began on the eighteenth day of December, is led by the national Association for the advancement of people of color (NAACP), after a report revealed that a Russian campaign on the platform and tried to suppress the electoral participation of african-american. The impact that this will have on Facebook, or the campaign DeleteFacebook, which began in march, will depend on the question whether an anti-Facebook is powered by the latest revelations. To professor Carroll, the story on the sharing of private messages of users of Facebook with other companies has been the “straw that broke the camel's back”, which prompted him to permanently remove his account Facebook. But it is not so easy for some people to just delete their account, particularly in developing countries whose Internet access is limited. Facebook has targeted such areas in order to increase its user base through initiatives such as Free Basics and the Internet. org, which can offer to some people their only way to communicate on the Internet. Zuckerberg presented it as a humanitarian effort to connect the world, but critics have said that it was an attempt at barely disguised colonization digital, locking people in Facebook and its various products. It should not, therefore, belong to the users to make changes through a boycott of Facebook, said professor Carroll. “Facebook has the monopoly of social relations on its major platforms, including Instagram and WhatsApp. For many people, especially in developing countries, Facebook and its platforms are the Internet,” he said. “It is either the employees of Facebook, or to legislators to influence change. Employees may protest, we have already seen people leave, and this can adversely affect Facebook if their talent disappears. Employees are the backbone of the morale of the company and they hold the power, so if this is not pressure legal, it will be them who will fall to Facebook.
” The globalists knew that they were going to lose the battle of the info because of the internet, that was no problem, they have decided to drown out the good sources of info in the middle of thousands of info false or partial.
Which made today, it is very difficult to disentangle the true from the false, even for someone very knowledgeable to What I note above all, it is that social networks are a famous thorns in the side of globalists. The information is hardly “controllable” and affect a lot more people than the traditional media. The hunting season is open.
