Just after the Supreme Court had declared"incompetent"to rule on the decision of the minister of territorial Administration and Decentralization, general Bouréma Condé, who cancelled the election of the mayor of Matoto, the main advocate of the UFDG (Union of Democratic Forces of Guinea), Mr. According to Me Salifou Béavogui, the administrative chamber of the Supreme Court has not considered the decision of the minister Bouréma CondéRather, it has been estimated that it is not for the minister to take a decision instead of the court, he indicated. Instead, read his reaction."We thank the Supreme Court for having accepted to judge such a case in a record time. As a reminder, the fifteen of December, the election of the executive of the commune of Matoto has been organized. The voting began with the election of the mayor and the process went very well until its end I said that the closing of a poll occurs after the completion of counting votes. Then, after the votes are counted, the results gave twenty-three votes out of forty five of the candidate of the UFDG, Kalémoudou Yansané, which became automatically the mayor of the Commune of Matoto. It only remained to continue the process for the election of the vice-mayors and other members of the marie. The troubles caused by Balla Moussa Keita, Assistant to the secretary-general of the commune of Matoto, have occurred after the counting of the election of the mayor. Against all odds, the minister of territorial Administration and Decentralization, general Bouréma Condé, without any title, or right, and without quality, has made a denunciation setting aside the election of any in ordering its recovery. Yet, in law, the cancellation of an election is within the purview of the justice and not the minister of territorial Administration and Decentralization. We felt that its decision was in violation of articles of the Code of local authorities and of the electoral Code revised. It is for this reason that we have attacked his decision to the administrative chamber of the Supreme Court for ‘excess of power’. The opposing party has opposed the incompetence of the Supreme Court, arguing that the litigation is electoral, and that it should be decided by the court of first instance. We have managed with the support of evidence to demonstrate that this dispute is before the Supreme Court is administrative, and it is directed against the decision surprising and illegal, and the minister Bouréma Condé. Because the mayor is already elected, therefore, that neither of the two candidates referred to the tribunal within a period of hours to bring the latter to rule on it. We come out winners in this folder because the administrative law chamber of the Supreme Court has not considered the decision of the minister.
Rather, it has been estimated that it is not for the minister to take a decision in lieu and place of the tribunal", is a daily newspaper in new guinea, covering, quickly, and in the transparency, the information guinean in the form of full-text articles to bridge the gap between the truth and official information.
